INVESTITURES STRUGGLES

 

Church v Empire

 

When Pope Leo III placed a crown on the head of Charlemagne on Christmas Day, 800AD and declared him the first Holy Roman Emperor, the controversial act not only established the Holy Roman Empire (or restored it after its mainly pagan predecessor had lapsed in 476) – it also set off a succession of disputes over a single question: who was the superior authority - the Emperor or the Pope? The Pope, argued his supporters, had the authority to crown an Emperor so must be superior. The Pope, ran the counter-argument, had yielded his superiority and transferred it to the Emperor by the act of coronation.

 

The disputes raged hot and cold for centuries but at no point were they more bitter and contentious than during what has become known as the Investitures Struggles. The Struggles began as a dispute over the appointment of Popes and the standards to be met by bishops and clergy. In reality it was a bitter continuation of the contest for supremacy between Pope and Holy Roman Emperor and the involvement of the aristocracy in that contest. The main struggle took place between 1059 and 1095. Its end was technically formalised in 1122 at the Concordat of Worms where it was agreed that the Cardinals would elect the Pope in the presence of the Emperor. Even then, disagreements continued.

 

Preceding the struggles was an early eleventh century invasion of the lower half of the Italian peninsula by the Normans. Catholics living under their rule felt oppressed and appealed to Pope Leo IX for help. A papal army led by Leo himself attacked the Normans in 1053 but suffered defeat and Leo was captured. After reluctantly conceding the legitimacy of the Norman territorial gains he was released but died shortly after returning to Rome in 1054. Leo had been the first Pope to declare a need to revise the rules relating to clerical behaviour. He believed priests marrying and church appointments made in return for money or favour (simony) were bad practices and should be done away with. This was highly controversial and a clear factor leading to the Struggles. Leo’s papacy was eventful in other respects and included the Great Schism: separation of Christianity into western and eastern sectors with the west ruled from Rome and the east from Constantinople.

 

By 1059 Pope Nicholas II occupied the papal throne and the Investitures Struggles were fully unleashed when he issued an “Election Decree”, requiring Popes to be elected only by Cardinals and to eliminate any input from bishops, priests, the wider nobility, people of Rome and, very specifically and significantly, the Emperor. Alexander II succeeded Nicholas in 1061 before any new method of election could be put in place but after his death in 1073 Gregory VII was “elected” Pope by popular acclamation at the funeral of his predecessor – a previously unheard of method of appointment and a clear defiance of the Election Decree.

 

Pope Gregory VII - heavily enbroiled in Investitures Struggles

Gregory shared Leo’s views on clerical marriage and simony and energetically set about reforming the Church. He and his supporters had looked back and seen a gradual erosion of the stature of the papacy since the last major reorganisation by Pope Gregory I (590-604). Gregory I had wielded total power but much of it had been surrendered to the Emperor, King or lay authorities over the centuries. They concluded that a major reason was that church canon had accumulated haphazardly, was not accessibly codified and had fallen into disuse. Gregory VII summarised it in a small, easily distributed booklet and ensured it was put in the hands of all clergy. This re-affirmed the doctrine of strict celibacy and the proscription of simony. At the same time he issued a list of twenty-seven papal prerogatives which included the right to excommunicate Emperors and even depose them.

 

The Emperor at the time, Henry IV, was not impressed. Gregory had his supporters but so did the Imperialists who deplored the idea of placing any authority above the Emperor. The showdown came in 1075 when Henry attempted to replace a “troublesome” and independently-minded Archbishop of Milan with an appointee over which he had more control. The Pope warned Henry against such a move and threatened excommunication. The Emperor responded aggressively by gathering German bishops and having them sign a declaration that Gregory was a false Pope due to his unorthodox “election”. On reading the declaration Gregory immediately excommunicated and deposed the Emperor. The gloves were off. The population was in turmoil. Who do they support? The Pope (what Pope??) or the Emperor (what Emperor??)?

 

Christianity was the very bedrock of western civilisation in the 11th century, with the Papacy and the Empire its two executive arms. A three-pronged argument was now raging: the election of Popes, the controversy launched by Leo over clerical behaviour and, most vehemently, the Pope v Emperor pecking order.

 Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor, later King Henry

While the disputes were shaking the church to its very foundations, sections of the lay community saw them as an opportunity to further their own interests. Trouble was already brewing in Germany. Henry, known as King rather than Emperor since being deposed, had deprived wealthy magnates of their influence, and the peasants of Saxony feared being made serfs of the King who was building castles on their borders. Magnates and peasants both began asserting themselves on hearing of Henry’s excommunication and knowing they could rely on the Pope for support. Meanwhile a chance meeting between King Henry and Pope Gregory gave the King an opportunity to beg forgiveness for doubting the Pope’s legitimacy. This required the Pope to decide between ignoring the repentance in support of his allies in the dispute (the magnates and the Saxon peasants) or adhering to his priestly obligation to forgive when repentance is shown. He had little choice but to follow the latter course.

 

Feeling betrayed by the Pope’s action, the magnates now moved without papal support. They declared the deposition of Henry final and elected Rudolf of Swabia King in his place. Civil war broke out between the supporters of the respective “Kings”. The Pope now saw himself as a mediator and in 1079 sent legates to resolve the matter, requiring Henry and Rudolf to meet with the legates under threat of excommunication. The meeting was set for early 1080, shortly after Henry had won a battle against the Saxon peasants. Encouraged by his success Henry chose not to attend the meeting. Gregory deposed him for the second time and officially recognised Rudolf as King. Not to be outdone, Henry now deposed Pope Gregory. Such an act required signatures from an assembly of German bishops. Only a small group gathered as many did not recognise the King’s right to depose Popes.

 

To add yet another complication Rudolf was killed in battle that same year. Henry now re-claimed the throne for himself but remained off-side with Pope Gregory and the brutal war continued for another four years, now King v Pope rather than King v King. In 1084 Henry’s forces captured the greater part of Rome. Thirteen cardinals deserted to Henry’s cause and only the Normans saved Gregory by escorting him to safety in Salerno. Meanwhile, Henry had Clement III enthroned as Pope and Clement in turn crowned Henry IV as Emperor. The pendulum had swung wildly in Henry’s favour. The Normans, bemused spectators to this point, now viewed Rome as a haven for the enemy and they returned from the south to pillage the city, burning a large part of it. The civil war was indeed brutal. While Henry, as the monarch, had access to the more powerful fighting force, he was contending not just with the papal supporters and the Normans but also forces controlled by wealthy magnates from Bavaria and Saxony as well as other factions opposing the King. Parallel with the war on the ground was a “war of letters” with intellectuals on both sides penning persuasive arguments. A constant theme being expressed was the “divine” status of the King: God’s representative in all matters secular with the Pope’s authority limited to the spiritual realm. Papal supporters strongly rejected this.

 

In 1085 the tumultuous life of Pope Gregory came to an end when he died in exile at the age of 70. His reforming cause did not die with him. His supporters were not intimidated by Henry’s superior force and refused to support the election of Clement III even though he had been enthroned in St Peter’s. They proceeded to elect Victor III, and on Victor’s death elected Urban II who combined strong support for the Gregorian reforms with a flexibility that regained the support of the bishops and cardinals who had deserted Gregory. Wide support for Urban left Clement’s “papacy” without foundation (if it ever had one).

 

A master stroke by Urban in 1095 was to preach a crusade to reclaim Jerusalem. This was an act of enormous significance and cemented his leadership in temporal as well as spiritual matters. The warring sides now had a common enemy: the Moslems occupying the Holy Land. It was Henry’s turn to watch from the sideline. Urban’s single act had united Christendom throughout western Europe. Henry’s dilemma was that it had always been the duty of the Emperor to protect the church against pagans (at least, since Charlemagne), but throughout the Struggles the Emperor (or, mostly, the King) had been fighting the Pope so was in no mood to defend him or declare support for his crusade. This left the Pope responsible for protecting the crusaders throughout their tortuous journey into pagan lands. The crusade was successful in that it regained Jerusalem, albeit temporarily, from the Moslems and secured it for Christianity. The supremacy of the Papacy which Gregory had sought to assert was finally accomplished. Throughout Urban’s reign the Emperor (or King) had lost all religious authority, even in Italy and Germany.

 

The end was now in sight for this sorry chapter in western civilisation. As noted in the opening paragraph the right of the cardinals to elect the Pope was codified in the Concordat of Worms in 1122. This didn’t close the book on the Struggles as the status of the Papacy continued to oscillate in the eyes of the population. Clerical behaviour relating to celibacy and simony showed no permanent improvement. Secular rulers were later finding ways of appointing bishops of their choice and there were periods when the Emperor again wielded authority over the Pope. These issues and many others were addressed by Pope Innocent III, (1198-1216). After Innocent’s death, St Francis of Assisi, and more importantly, his followers, continued to rebuild the reputation of the church. One follower in particular (or perhaps mentor) became Pope Gregory IX in 1230 and his pontificate has historically been seen as the end of the Investitures Struggles.

Return to History/Biography Menu

Return to Home Page